Senator Lacson Uncovers Alarming Evidence in Flood Control Scandal
In a gripping revelation that could shake foundations, Senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson shared explosive findings on Wednesday regarding Senator Rodante Marcoleta and a staggering P500 million allocated for infrastructure projects. This shocking amount was granted by the late Public Works Undersecretary Maria Catalina Cabral, and it’s not just a footnote in history—it’s a key piece of evidence that will be forwarded to the Ombudsman.
Lacson, the chairman of the Senate Blue Ribbon committee, unveiled that these allocable funds, which are discretionary amounts assigned to each congressional district by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), stem from requests made to district engineers. It’s a system designed to empower lawmakers to choose projects that would benefit their regions. But what’s come to light isn’t just standard practice—it raises serious ethical questions.
“There’s even a handwritten note from the late Undersecretary Cabral that confirms this allocation was based on requests,” Lacson explained in a heartfelt discussion with Super Radyo dZBB. He emphasized that this particular allocation does not currently fall under the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman, making the evidence even more critical.
As emotions ran high, Lacson clarified: “Allocables themselves aren’t illegal, but they are inappropriate.” He underscored the importance of transparency, indicating that this documentation isn’t just personal—it represents a matter of public record, a testament to the vigilance required in public office.
“I have ordered the preparation of a transmittal letter to the Ombudsman,” he announced with earnest determination. “We want to ensure all relevant pieces of evidence—documentary, testimonial, and transcripts—are handed over.” This was not merely an administrative task; it felt like a solemn duty to uphold justice.
While discussing the future of the investigation, Lacson was asked if Marcoleta might face scrutiny. “Not at this time,” he replied thoughtfully, adding that it all hinges on whether any “ghost” or substandard projects are linked to him. It was a careful, measured response, reflecting the complexity of the situation.
Following a progress report on the investigation into the multi-billion peso flood control debacle, Lacson revealed that seven senators, including prominent figures like Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III and Senators Bam Aquino, Risa Hontiveros, Raffy Tulfo, Erwin Tulfo, and Kiko Pangilinan, have already signed the partial committee report. Yet, Lacson is resolute—he won’t entertain further questions until the report is submitted for broader debate. It’s a call to unity among his peers as they navigate this storm.
But amidst all the chaos, one pivotal question lingered: Is there a singular mastermind behind this sprawling scandal? Lacson firmly believes not. “I don’t think there’s an overall mastermind,” he stated, defying sensational narratives. Instead, he suggested a more intricate web of influences, “There may be individuals across regions or agencies. It’s not the sort of organized crime where one person pulls all the strings.”
As he painted a picture of varied influences, he pointed out, “In every region or district engineer, there may be a mastermind.” It’s a sobering acknowledgment that accountability may be diffused across many, requiring diligent investigation from the committee.
With the possibility of resuming legislative inquiries before the Senate adjourns, Lacson affirmed the resolve to secure enough evidence to link the allocables to the troubling specter of ghost and substandard flood control projects.
In a time filled with uncertainty and doubt, Senator Lacson stands committed—to transparency, to justice, and to holding those in power accountable. The tide of change may be upon us, and the call for integrity in public service resonates louder than ever.
